AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor)

My feedback

  1. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Totally agree. Basically you want a way to select multiple checks in the table and then mark all of them as ignore, similar to the in-table-bulk-operations that Rigor Optimization provides.

    There is a larger need to move bulk actions like this out of Monitoring “Bulk Edit” page and into individual tables, but this could be a good place to start

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    Totally agree. Basically you want a way to select multiple checks in the table and then mark all of them as ignore, similar to the in-table-bulk-operations that Rigor Optimization provides.

    There is a larger need to move bulk actions like this out of Monitoring "Bulk Edit" page and into individual tables, but this could be a good place to start

  2. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    We do have a way in the app to compute what we call SLA uptime, which specifically only flags downtime if 2 or more failures occur in a row, helping reduce the impact of a bad location.

    Reaching out to Melanie with some clarifying questions

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    We do have a way in the app to compute what we call SLA uptime, which specifically only flags downtime if 2 or more failures occur in a row, helping reduce the impact of a bad location.

    Reaching out to Melanie with some clarifying questions

  3. 22 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    This is a great idea Chris and I 100% agree. Right now, custom reports offer only the measurements that all checks offer, so all those great stats with collect in RBC aren’t available. We are fixing that. First step is we are about to introduce a bunch of additional RBC metrics we collect. Then we are revamping Custom Reports so that RBC checks can include more metrics, like DomContentLoaded, etc

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    This is a great idea Chris and I 100% agree. Right now, custom reports offer only the measurements that all checks offer, so all those great stats with collect in RBC aren't available. We are fixing that. First step is we are about to introduce a bunch of additional RBC metrics we collect. Then we are revamping Custom Reports so that RBC checks can include more metrics, like DomContentLoaded, etc

  4. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    100% agree. We have big plans for the Benchmark checks, and the first step is to allow both User-Agent and ViewPort settings when configuring

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    100% agree. We have big plans for the Benchmark checks, and the first step is to allow both User-Agent and ViewPort settings when configuring

  5. 23 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Thanks for the suggestion Duncan. This makes total sense. To be clear, with the Rigor API you can pull this data out now, but making it easier to fetch as a CSV would be very valuable. Reviewing options for this.

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    Thanks for the suggestion Duncan. This makes total sense. To be clear, with the Rigor API you can pull this data out now, but making it easier to fetch as a CSV would be very valuable. Reviewing options for this.

  6. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    makes total sense and could provide a lot of value

  7. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Exposing the HAR via an API is how the Rigor Monitoring → Rigor Optimization integration works. We can work to make this public for our users

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    Exposing the HAR via an API is how the Rigor Monitoring -> Rigor Optimization integration works. We can work to make this public for our users

  8. 45 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    We are reviewing use cases for our custom reports now, and I can how more specific time granularity would be helpful, especially when you want to focus on, or exclude, a specific time period of trouble.

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    We are reviewing use cases for our custom reports now, and I can how more specific time granularity would be helpful, especially when you want to focus on, or exclude, a specific time period of trouble.

  9. 65 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Makes total sense. We are reviewing our UI to see how to better organize things so that customers with large numbers of checks can help navigate and review things

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    Makes total sense. We are reviewing our UI to see how to better organize things so that customers with large numbers of checks can help navigate and review things

  10. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    This makes sense. fundamentally we need to provide a comprehensive way to update a checks settings via the API. A v1.0 of this could be to just allow updating check settings, but not say RBC steps (since bulk updating selenium steps could be challenging). Reaching out to reporters with some clarifying questions.

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    I can definitely see the value here. fundamentally there needs to be a way to update check configuration via the API, not just header/cookies. Reaching out to Colin via email to understand if there are other use cases

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    This makes sense. A v1.0 of this could be to update check settings, but not steps (since bulk updating selenium steps could be challenging). Reaching out to Josh with some clarifying questions.

  11. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    This is an excellent idea. Right now, Optimization just focuses on analysis, but I can see pulling this data from the HAR, or including this chart in Monitoring

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    This is an excellent idea. Right now, Optimization just focuses on analysis, but I can see pulling this data from the HAR, or including this chart in Monitoring

  12. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    I can see how this is valuable. You want the rate at which Rigor runs a check to more accurately reflect how a user would use the app

  13. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    Not entirely clear on the ask. Sounds like a current date/time variable could solve this issue. Emailing Arie for clarification.

  14. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    I can see how this would be helpful.

  15. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    I can see how that would be helpful. Considering how to do this while still allowing the checks to be meaningful

  16. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    We support this currently via the “Bulk Change” feature in the app, allowing you to mute/unmute and pause/unpause any checks you like.

    However, only group admin users can see that option, and I like the idea of having it inline as an option with the table you are using.

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    We support this currently via the "Bulk Change" feature in the app, allowing you to mute/unmute and pause/unpause any checks you like.

    However, only group admin users can see that option, and I like the idea of having it inline as an option with the table you are using.

  17. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    This is a great idea. Muted checks and forgetting about them can lead to a ton of problems and creates a blindspot for the organization, so I like the idea of a timed mute that auto reverts.

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    This is a great idea. Muted checks and forgetting about them can lead to a ton of problems and creates a blindspot for the organization, so I like the idea of a timed mute that auto reverts.

  18. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Thanks for the input. We are always evaluating new locations to add, and the idea exchange is a great way for our customers to tell us and vote for new locations to we can understand the priority.

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    Thanks for the input. We are always evaluating new locations to add, and the idea exchange is a great way for our customers to tell us and vote for new locations to we can understand the priority.

  19. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    This is a good idea Barry. Allows for greater transparency. We are currently collecting use cases for a reworking of our alerting/notifications system, so this is helpful to know about.

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    This is a good idea Barry. Allows for greater transparency. We are currently collecting use cases for a reworking of our alerting/notifications system, so this is helpful to know about.

  20. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Totally agree. We are reviewing use cases to define the success criteria for a complete rework of the notification system. One of those being allowing the to both notify and escalate to different webhooks

    AdminProduct Team (Admin, Rigor) commented  · 

    Totally agree. We are reviewing use cases to define the success criteria for a complete rework of the notification system. One of those being allowing the to both notify and escalate to different webhooks

Feedback and Knowledge Base